Conciseness

Lean, directive prose with concrete paths and commands and no padding about concepts Claude already knows; not 5 because the downstream-consumer caveat is restated across Scope, Working Rules, and Validation, which could be tightened.

Actionability

Provides copy-pasteable validation commands ('cd packages/shared-schemas && npm run build', 'npx tsc --noEmit') and specific paths to check; not 5 because there is no concrete example of how to actually author or restructure a schema file.

Workflow Clarity

Working Rule 3 sequences schema change → backend → dashboard → import sweep → downstream callout, and the Validation section gives explicit checkpoints; not 5 because there is no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop.

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with no external references needed and clean section structure (Scope, Working Rules, Validation); per the simple-skill guideline this earns a 5 for well-organized sections.

Specificity

Quotes 'editing published Zod contracts, exported types, and shared API payload definitions' name several concrete actions/targets; falls short of 5 because the actions are all variants of 'editing' rather than a comprehensive set of distinct operations.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: 'what' ('editing published Zod contracts, exported types, and shared API payload definitions') and 'when' ('Use this skill when contributing to InsForge's shared schema package') with concrete trigger phrasing.

Trigger Term Quality

Phrases like 'contributing to InsForge's shared schema package', 'Zod contracts', 'exported types', and 'API payload definitions' give good keyword coverage a maintainer would say; not 5 because common synonyms (e.g. 'Zod schemas', 'shared types') are absent.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Tied to a named package and Zod contracts gives a clear niche with minimal conflict risk; not 5 because general schema/type-editing activity has minor overlap with broader TypeScript or schema skills.