Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and well-structured with real, one-level-deep references, but it lists commands twice (costing conciseness) and omits validation/feedback checkpoints for its batch and setup operations, capping workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Collapse the duplicate command listing — keep either the intent-oriented bullets or the executable `Commands` block, not both — to recover token budget.
Add explicit validation checkpoints after setup/batch commands (e.g. confirm the web server is reachable after `web init`/`web restart`, verify the git checkpoint landed after `web checkpoint`, confirm `STRIPE_WEBHOOK_SECRET` was written after `stripe register-webhook`) with a fix-and-retry loop.
Add an error-recovery note for the build step (what to do when `scripts/build.sh` fails or `bin/ii-app` stays stale) so the workflow has a feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence with no concept over-explanation, but each command appears twice — once in the opening bullet list and again in the `Commands` bash block — which is trimmable redundancy. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The `Commands` block provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready invocations with all required flags, and the flags section enumerates concrete options (`--database-url`, `--host-url`, `--skip-install`, `--json`) covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence is present with a staleness check, but setup/batch operations like `web init`, `web checkpoint`, and `stripe register-webhook` lack explicit post-action validation or error-recovery feedback loops, which the rubric caps at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clean overview with two well-signaled, one-level-deep references (`references/template-ids.md`, `references/cli-contract.md`), both verified to exist, with bulk detail appropriately split out and commands kept inline as the core material. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |