Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured, actionable, and appropriately clear for a single read-only tool, scoring well on workflow clarity and actionability. The main drag is conciseness, hurt by a verbatim duplication of the filter syntax inside the input table.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated filter-syntax paragraph from the `filter` input-table cell and reference the Filter syntax section instead to cut padding.
Replace the placeholder `string_value` in the CLI example with a realistic filter (e.g. `t:Material l:env`) so the example is immediately runnable.
Consider moving the full input/output JSON schemas into referenced files to keep SKILL.md as a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with clear sections, but the filter syntax is described in prose and then re-stated verbatim inside the `filter` input-table cell as a long duplicated wall of text, which is unnecessary padding. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready CLI invocations plus input-file and stdin alternatives and troubleshooting, but the example uses placeholder `string_value` rather than a realistic filter, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a single, unambiguous read-only search action with a clearly shown call form; the rubric's simple-skill exception allows a 5 for a single unambiguous action, and the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply to a query tool. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into Filter syntax, How to Call, Input, and Output sections with no nested file references (no bundle files exist), though the full input and output JSON schemas are inlined rather than deferred, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |