Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an actionable, well-sectioned tool reference with executable CLI examples and complete schemas, but it inlines two bulky JSON schemas that would be better placed in a references file and repeats the path syntax in multiple places.
Suggestions
Move the full Input/Output JSON schemas into a references/ file (e.g. SCHEMAS.md) and link to it from the body to improve progressive disclosure and token efficiency.
De-duplicate the path syntax: define it once in the Path syntax section and reference it from the Input table and viewQuery description instead of repeating it.
Replace the placeholder 'string_value' in the How to Call example with a realistic assetRef object so the example is immediately runnable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Prose sections are lean and assume Claude's competence, but the path syntax is described three times (Path syntax section, Input table, and inside the ViewQuery schema) and both full JSON schemas are inlined, making it 'mostly efficient with some unnecessary/redundant content' rather than fully lean. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready bash invocations (run-tool with --input, --input-file, and stdin pipe) plus full input/output schemas — 'mostly executable guidance' with the minor gap that the example uses placeholder 'string_value' rather than a realistic assetRef. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single tool call is unambiguous and the assets-find prerequisite is stated, giving a clear sequence; it stops short of 5 only because there is no explicit validation/checkpoint (e.g. confirming the asset was found before reading), though the read-only nature means the destructive-validation cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headers organize the doc, but the large input and output JSON schemas are inlined directly in SKILL.md with no bundle files (references/scripts/assets are absent), so reference material that belongs in a separate file is inline, fitting the 'some structure but could be better organized' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |