Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is actionable, well-structured, and appropriately concise for a simple single-purpose tool skill, with concrete examples and an explicit error guard. Main improvements are de-duplicating the `save` input presentation and giving a real-value example in the stdin snippet.
Suggestions
Consolidate the `save` input description: keep one of the prose, table, or JSON schema and drop the redundant restatement to improve token efficiency.
Replace the placeholder '{"param": "value"}' in the stdin example with the actual '{"save": false}' to make it directly executable.
Move the full Input/Output JSON schemas into a referenced reference file and keep only a compact summary inline to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the `save` input is restated three ways (prose, the Input table, and the Input JSON Schema), creating redundancy that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready bash command plus file/stdin variants and troubleshooting, but the stdin example uses a generic '{"param": "value"}' placeholder rather than the real `save` argument, a minor gap below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | For a single-action skill, the close operation is unambiguous with an explicit guard ('Throws when no prefab stage is currently open') and an explicit consequence for save=false; no multi-step validate loop is needed, so it sits at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with one-level cross-references to sibling skills and no bundle files to mismanage, but the inlined input/output JSON schemas are bulk that could be split into a reference, keeping it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |