Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of a lean, single-purpose build skill: every command is copy-paste ready, conditions for running each step are stated tersely, and verification is built in. The only shortfall is the absence of an explicit fix-and-retry feedback loop in the Report section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every sentence carries non-obvious, project-specific information ("Only needed if `node_modules/` is missing or `package.json` changed", "Only needed once — after that, `npm run build` alone is sufficient") with zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | All guidance is fully executable copy-paste commands (`cd cli && npm install`, `npm run build`, `npm link`, `unity-mcp-cli --version`) with explicit conditional handling via `$ARGUMENTS`, matching the 'fully executable; copy-paste ready' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four steps are clearly sequenced with an explicit verification checkpoint and error-surfacing instruction ("If any step failed, show the error output"), but there is no fix-and-retry recovery loop, placing it between the anchor-4 'minor validation gaps' and anchor-5 'feedback loops for error recovery'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references, and is organized into clearly labeled step sections plus a Report section, which per the rubric's own guideline earns a 5 with just well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |