Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with executable CLI examples and a clear single-step workflow, but it is held back by duplicated field descriptions and a large inline schema that could be moved to a reference file.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the field descriptions: keep them in the Output JSON Schema and summarize the Fields list, or vice versa.
Move the full Output JSON Schema into a references/ file and link to it from the body to improve progressive disclosure.
Clarify or remove the placeholder `nothing` input parameter, which adds noise without value.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with no concept over-explanation, but field descriptions are duplicated between the Fields list and the inline Output JSON Schema, which could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready executable commands (unity-mcp-cli run-tool ...) with input, --input-file, and stdin variants plus a troubleshooting fix, matching the fully-executable anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-task skill whose single action (invoke the tool) is unambiguous, with a troubleshooting checkpoint for the CLI-not-found case; no destructive/batch steps require validation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized but no bundle/reference files exist, and the large inline Output JSON Schema is content that could be split into a separate reference, so structure is only partially optimized. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |