Conciseness

Parameter documentation is triplicated across the 'Filters'/'Response toggles' bullet sections, the Input table, and the full Input JSON Schema, and the ~140-line Output JSON Schema with fully-qualified .NET names (e.g. 'com.IvanMurzak.Unity.MCP.Editor.API.TestRunner.TestResultData') is padded inline content Claude does not need. This is noticeably verbose with several duplicated sections, fitting the 2 anchor rather than the 'could be tightened' 3 anchor.

Actionability

The body provides a concrete runnable command ('unity-mcp-cli run-tool tests-run --input ...') with input-file and stdin variants, CLI-not-found troubleshooting, and real RQL examples ('tests | where fullName contains "Spline" | select fullName mode'). It stops short of 5 because the primary invocation example uses placeholders ('string_value' even for enum fields like testMode) instead of a worked, realistic example.

Workflow Clarity

The call flow and error-recovery feedback loops are explicit: dirty scenes throw and the text says 'save them and retry'; compilation errors 'short-circuit the run and return the error details so the caller can fix the project first'; domain reloads auto-resume. It is not 5 because there is no explicitly numbered sequence or final result-validation checkpoint, but it clearly exceeds the 'checkpoints missing or implicit' 3 anchor.

Progressive Disclosure

Section headers (Filters, Response toggles, Domain reloads, How to Call, Input, Output) give reasonable navigation and there are no nested references, but the bulky input/output JSON schemas are inlined when they clearly belong in separate reference files. This matches 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline' rather than 2, since structure and navigation are present.

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions — 'Execute Unity tests', 'return per-test results', 'filtering by test assembly, namespace, class, and method', 'Refreshes the AssetDatabase first', 'defers execution across domain reloads' — with comprehensive coverage of the tool's capabilities in third-person voice. It exceeds the 'several specific actions with minor gaps' (4) anchor because both the core capability and its edge behaviors (reload deferral, dirty-scene abort) are covered.

Completeness

The 'what' is clearly answered (execute Unity tests, return per-test results, filtering), but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines; the scene-saving precondition is a precondition, not a when-to-use trigger.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural Unity terms are present ('Unity tests', 'EditMode', 'PlayMode', 'test assembly', 'namespace', 'class', 'method') that users would actually say. It falls short of the comprehensive-synonyms anchor (5) because common variations like 'unit tests', 'test suite', or 'run the tests' are missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Execute Unity tests (EditMode or PlayMode)' carves out a clear niche with distinct Unity-specific triggers, so conflict with other skills is minimal. It is not 4 because the triggers (Unity, EditMode/PlayMode, test assembly/namespace/class/method) are unambiguous and would not plausibly fire a non-Unity skill.