Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-built instructional skill: dense, concrete, and immediately executable, with a correct naming convention, invariant checklist, and a compile-verification step. Its weaknesses are minor — a small duplication between the When-to-Use bullets and the Step 2 table, and no error-recovery guidance after the Step 5 compile check.
Suggestions
Close the feedback loop in Step 5: state what to do when console-get-logs reports errors (e.g., fix the offending variant, re-run assets-refresh, re-check logs) so the workflow matches the full validation cycle.
Deduplicate the API-change list: the 'When to Use' bullets repeat the same EntityId/GetInstanceID mappings as the Step 2 table — keep one (the table) and let the intro reference it.
Note in the naming section that the Editor/Runtime rows are the combined-guard form of the same UNITY_6000_5_OR_NEWER rule, so the four-row table doesn't read as separate conventions to memorize.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean overall — no explaining of Unity basics, dense tables, and a tight before/after example — but the "When to Use" bullet list duplicates the Step 2 API-mapping table, and the four-row Editor/Runtime guard table is derivable from one stated rule. These minor redundancies keep it below the every-token-earns-its-place level of 5, while it is clearly above the 3 anchor ("some unnecessary explanation"). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: exact file names, exact preprocessor guards, an invariant checklist (#nullable enable, matching copyright header, partial classes, matching #endif), named tools (assets-refresh, console-get-logs), and a complete before/after code example covering the common nested-#if case. Not the 4 anchor because there are no meaningful gaps in the concrete detail. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence (read → identify split points → create both files → assets-refresh → verify) with a real validation checkpoint in Step 5 via console-get-logs. Below the 5 anchor because the failure path is not closed: the skill never says what to do when compile errors are found (no fix-and-recheck feedback loop), which the 5 anchor explicitly requires. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent), so this is a single self-contained SKILL.md; sections are well-organized with headers and tables, and the "Reference Files" section clearly signals real codebase examples. It sits between anchors: better-organized than the 3 anchor (inline content that should be separate), but short of the 5 anchor's well-signaled one-level-deep references since the ~110-line body keeps everything inline with no pointer structure at all. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |