Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced operational skill: every step has an executable command, explicit exit conditions, and failure paths. Weaknesses are minor — some repeated exit-condition prose and a missing post-edit verification step for apply jobs.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and operational throughout — token tables, curl commands, job shapes — with no primer on concepts Claude already knows. Minor trimming opportunities exist: the three exit conditions are restated in both the loop section and step 5, and the 'Two modes' section repeats the frontmatter description. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable: copy-paste curl commands for every endpoint with complete JSON payloads, exact request/response shapes for all three job kinds, a suggestion-field table, and explicit fallback/error payloads ('{"applied":false,"summary":…}', /jobs/<id>/error). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered loop (steps 0–5) with prioritized exit conditions, idle-backoff checkpoints, and distinct handling per job kind including not-found fallbacks. Not a 5 because apply jobs write to user source with no post-edit verification step and no validate-retry loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured single file with anchored jump links to the scan/apply sections, and the inlining of the recipe catalog and token tables is explicitly justified by the one-shot, zero-file-reads speed requirement ('its tokens and decision rules are inlined here'). Not a 5 because the 21-recipe catalog and token tables could still live in a one-level-deep reference for non-latency contexts. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |