Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with concrete commands and clear mode selection, but it carries substantial redundancy (the flowchart and prose describe the same modes twice), omits validation for a batch operation, and its most-critical referenced file (the capabilities prompt template) is missing from the bundle — with a setup section that also names the wrong dependency (level npm package vs the node:sqlite built-in the scripts actually use).
Suggestions
Remove the mermaid flowchart or the prose mode descriptions — they duplicate each other; keep one and cut the ~25 redundant lines to improve token efficiency.
Fix the bundle references: create resources/describe-your-capabilities.template.md (or correct its path), and delete the 'Setup (First Time Only)' section's `level` npm package instructions — the scripts use Node's built-in node:sqlite (Node >= 22.5.0), so no package install is needed.
Add validation checkpoints before the dump step: verify each spawned agent's entry exists in the store (e.g. re-run the lookup for each agent-id) and specify what to do when a Task fails or returns no tagged content, since the experiment batches writes from all agents simultaneously.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 25-line mermaid flowchart fully duplicates the prose that immediately follows it ('Single-agent mode — ...', 'Multi-agent mode — ...', 'Template usage — ...'), and the Full Experiment Workflow restates the invocation-mode steps again. This is more than the minor over-explanation of anchor 4, but the rest of the body is efficient, matching anchor 3. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable commands throughout: 'node $CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/update-agent-map.mjs --name "agent-id" --capabilities …'', the dump command, the populate script, a node -e lookup one-liner, and a concrete report output template. Not anchor 5 because paths are inconsistent ('$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/resources/…' vs './resources/…') and the pivotal template file reference does not resolve. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (seed descriptions → read template → spawn agents → wait for all → dump → gap analysis) is clearly ordered across both modes, but this batch operation has no validation steps: no check that every spawned agent's entry landed in the store before the dump, and no handling of failed or non-responsive Tasks. Per the rubric's cap, a batch workflow without validation cannot score above 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is good and the Resources section lists bundle files one level deep, but scoring against the actual bundle reveals the core referenced artifact './resources/describe-your-capabilities.template.md' does not exist in the bundle (there is no resources/ directory) — a dangling reference to the exact prompt the whole workflow depends on. Better organized than anchor 2, but a broken primary reference keeps it below anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |