Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body excels at workflow clarity and progressive disclosure, with an authoritative sequenced procedure and well-organized one-level references. It is weaker on conciseness (workflow is duplicated in prose and diagram) and actionability (the prompt templates that drive the skill live only in reference files).
Suggestions
Collapse the duplication between the 6-step numbered workflow and the Phase 1-3 Mermaid diagram — keep the authoritative diagram and trim the prose list to the phase labels, or vice versa.
Inline one or two concrete prompt templates (e.g., one Perspective Multiplication and one Inversion example) so the body is self-contained for the most common cases before pointing to references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with no padding of concepts Claude already knows, but the numbered 6-step workflow and the Phase 1-3 Mermaid diagram state nearly the same procedure twice, a real redundancy beyond minor over-explanation. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete workflow steps and a named output path are provided, but the core executable content (the actual prompt templates) is deferred to reference files rather than included inline, leaving key details absent from the body. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced workflow is given both as a numbered list and an authoritative Mermaid diagram with an explicit approval decision branch and a revision feedback loop (re-present on revision). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview with seven well-labeled, one-level-deep references to real reference files (all verified to exist), with the bulk pattern detail appropriately split out for easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |