Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-structured repair workflow with strong validation feedback loops and concrete ops. The weaknesses are minor: application detail partly deferred to external scripts, and a Packet block that lists bundle layers not actually present.
Suggestions
Trim or correct the wire-packet layer list in the Packet block so it only advertises directories that actually exist in the bundle (references/, scripts/, assets/).
Add a short inline note or example showing how one op (e.g. fill_placeholders) is concretely applied, so the procedure is less dependent on referenced external scripts for execution detail.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and information-dense with no padding — it assumes Claude's competence, uses compact provenance tags ([CÓDIGO], [EXPLICIT], [SUPUESTO]), and never explains concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives a concrete command ('audit_harness.py <dir> --emit-fix') and names each op (fill_placeholders, demote_status, etc.), but the actual application mechanics rely on referenced external scripts, leaving minor executable gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered 1–4 sequence with an explicit validation feedback loop ('Re-corre el audit: el score DEBE subir o el patch se revierte') and a Contract section covering revert-on-regress and conflicting-op ordering. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is an overview pointing one level deep to a real, clearly signaled references/check-to-fix.md, but the Packet block advertises layer directories (knowledge/, prompts/, examples/, agents/) that do not exist in the bundle — a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |