Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well structured: executable baseline code patterns, a verification-gated workflow, and a clean load-when reference table pointing to real bundle files. Its only weakness is minor token waste in the Knowledge Reference section, version-number mentions, and promotional footer lines.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The workflow, constraints, and reference table are lean and every code example is complete, but the "Knowledge Reference" section restates technologies (Laravel 11, Symfony 7, Redis, MySQL/PostgreSQL) Claude already knows, version numbers appear outside any deprecated/old-patterns section, and the maintainer/footer lines are promotional padding that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: exact verification commands (`vendor/bin/phpstan analyse --level=9`, `vendor/bin/phpunit` or `vendor/bin/pest`) and four copy-paste-ready, complete code examples (readonly DTO, constructor-DI service, mocked PHPUnit test, enum with match expression) covering the common implementation cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step Core Workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit validation gate and feedback loop: "Run vendor/bin/phpstan analyse --level=9; fix all errors before proceeding", "enforce 80%+ coverage", and "Only deliver when both pass clean". | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The Reference Guide table signals five one-level-deep references (all of which exist in references/) with per-topic "Load When" conditions, while the always-needed baseline code patterns stay inline in the body — an appropriately split, easily navigable structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |