Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean skill body with a clear validated workflow, concrete code patterns, and exemplary progressive disclosure via a condition-based reference table. Its minor weaknesses are small redundancies with the frontmatter and a few guidance points (coverage targets, the pytest variant) that lack concrete specifics.
Suggestions
Trim the trailing maintainer credit and documentation link (and the one-line intro restating the frontmatter) to tighten conciseness.
Make coverage guidance concrete: state a specific target (e.g., '80% line coverage on changed files') so 'verify coverage targets are met' is executable rather than open-ended.
Either make the quick-start example self-contained (define or import `calculateDiscount`) or add a one-line note that it illustrates assertion style, and give the pytest variant a real two-line example instead of a parenthetical.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — a compact workflow, one minimal code example, a reference table, and terse MUST DO/MUST NOT lists — but the trailing maintainer/documentation lines and the one-line intro duplicate information already in the frontmatter, so not every token earns its place. It fits the 4 anchor (efficient, minor instances that could be trimmed) better than 5, and is clearly above 3 (no padded explanatory sections). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance dominates: an executable Jest example with specific assertions (`expect(result).toBe(90)`), failure-handling steps, and specific constraint patterns like "quarantine and fix them; don't just re-run until green". Minor gaps keep it at 4 rather than 5: the example calls an undefined `calculateDiscount` (illustrative rather than runnable), "Verify coverage targets are met" names no concrete target, and the pytest mention is a one-line gesture rather than an example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step Core Workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit feedback loops and checkpoints: "If tests fail: classify the failure (assertion error vs. environment/flakiness), fix root cause, re-run", "If tests are flaky: isolate ordering dependencies, check async handling", and "Verify coverage targets are met before closing; flag gaps explicitly". This matches the 5 anchor (explicit validation steps, error-recovery loops). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a genuine overview: a quick-start example plus a well-signaled table of ten one-level-deep references, each with a topic, real file path (all ten exist in references/), and a specific "Load When" condition. This matches the 5 anchor (clear overview, well-signaled one-level-deep references, easy navigation); no nesting or buried references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |