Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar reference skill: concise but dense, immediately actionable with named tools and exact identifiers, a clearly sequenced workflow with validation, and clean progressive disclosure to six well-signaled one-level references. Content appropriately split between the overview and bundle files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense with expertise: every section earns its tokens (mental model, critical directives, numbered workflow, reference index) and assumes Claude's competence, avoiding generic explanations of what MPS or dataflow is. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete and actionable throughout: named MCP tools (mps_mcp_create_model, mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems), exact aspect-ID spelling ('dataFlow', case-sensitive), and a numbered workflow with specific emit-statement types and positions. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear six-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint (step 6: 'Validate with mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems') and a debugging feedback path (inspect a known-good builder with mps_mcp_print_node deep:true) for error recovery. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured overview that points to six one-level-deep references, each with a clear 'open when...' trigger and verified bundle files that match the referenced paths (concept-catalog.md, json-patterns.md, rules-and-pitfalls.md, etc.). | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |