Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, well-organized, and offers a concrete workflow with a validation step, but its progressive disclosure promise is broken because all referenced reference files are missing from the bundle.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced files under references/ (form-selection.md, json-blueprints.md, lang-migration-reference.md, etc.) so the Reference Index links resolve, or remove links to files that are not bundled.
Add an explicit error-recovery loop after the validation step (e.g. 'If check_root_node_problems reports issues, fix and re-run until clean, then execute the migration').
Inline at least one minimal JSON blueprint for a PureMigrationScript so the body is actionable even before opening references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it never explains what MPS or a migration is, and each directive and workflow step earns its place without padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance with specific MCP tool names (mps_mcp_create_model, mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems) and naming conventions, but the actual JSON script body construction is deferred to reference files rather than shown inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence is present with a validation checkpoint at step 6 (mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems), but the validation step lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop (fix and re-check). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure and a well-signaled one-level reference index are present, but the referenced files (references/form-selection.md, json-blueprints.md, etc.) do not actually exist in the bundle, so the disclosure structure is asserted but not realized. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |