Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, information-dense design-tier skill: the 2×2 taxonomy, decision procedure, and routing table are clear and token-efficient, and validation guidance is present. Its main defect is bundle integrity — all six reference files it routes to are missing, so the recipes and per-kind validation checklist it promises cannot be reached, and the pseudo-syntax note refers to snippets absent from the body.
Suggestions
Ship the six referenced files under references/ (referencing.md, extension.md, reuse.md, embedding.md, design-principles.md, validation.md) or inline the essential per-kind recipes and validation checklist into SKILL.md — as delivered, every entry in the Reference index is a dead path.
Add at least one concrete (clearly-labeled illustrative) snippet or tool invocation per kind, or remove the 'Code snippets here are illustrative pseudo-syntax' note, since the body currently contains no snippets at all.
Tighten the 'Loading companion skills' paragraph and trim the overlap between 'Critical directives' and the decision-procedure/four-kinds sections, which restate the same fork and dependency guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean: the 2×2 table, decision procedure, and four-kinds table are dense with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Minor trimmable fat remains — the 'Loading companion skills' paragraph is lengthy, and 'Critical directives' partially restate points made again in the decision procedure and four-kinds sections. Not a clean 5: those repetitions could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The decision procedure is concrete (binary questions with explicit outcomes), but the promised per-kind recipes and 'Full per-kind checklist: references/validation.md' are deferred to reference files that are absent from the bundle, so key implementation details are effectively missing. The closing note 'Code snippets here are illustrative pseudo-syntax' refers to snippets that do not exist in the body, and no executable commands or tool invocations appear. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The decision procedure is a clear, unambiguous sequence (Q1 inline? → Q2 dependency allowed? → Q3 built-for-host vs independent?) that routes each outcome to named implementing aspects, and the Validation section names concrete checkpoints ('Run the model checker over the example suite after every structural or generator change', 'test the semantic seams'). Falls short of 5 because the detailed per-kind checklist is deferred to a missing file, leaving validation partially implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body itself is well organized with a clearly signaled one-level-deep 'Reference index', but every one of the six referenced paths (references/referencing.md, extension.md, reuse.md, embedding.md, design-principles.md, validation.md) does not exist — the references/ directory is absent from the bundle. Judged against the actual bundle structure, the promised detail layer is unreachable, which is more than the 'minor organization gaps' of a 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |