Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and appropriately uses load-on-demand references for related capabilities. Its main gap is the lack of an explicit validation/retry feedback loop in a workflow that performs batch multi-plate layout.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/feedback step after plate generation (e.g., preview -> if objects overlap or exceed plate bounds, adjust layout and regenerate) to support the batch operation.
Include a short concrete example of the `cad.print.prepare` invocation (with key arguments) to make the guidance copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient body with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the preset dimension table is useful concrete data that earns its tokens. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete tool name (`cad.print.prepare`), specific parameters (`allow_quarter_turn`), preset dimensions, and load-on-demand flags, but lacks a copy-paste-ready code or call example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered 1-5 sequence with a preview checkpoint and stale-layout rejection exists, but there is no explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop for a batch/multi-plate operation, which caps the score per the rubric. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections and clearly signaled one-level-deep load-on-demand references (`$gcode`, `$bambu-labs`); no external files are needed, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |