Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable skill body with executable commands, an explicit validation gate and feedback loop, and well-signaled one-level-deep references. The only minor gap is reference presentation style for progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Break the references into a short dedicated reference block (e.g. a '## References' list with links to references/hardware-bom-schema.md and the vendored originals) so the pointer structure is visually explicit rather than embedded in a workflow step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout — 'Every purchasable part needs REAL supplier evidence. Never write stock, price, or LCSC codes from memory.' — with terse command examples and no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable: concrete commands with real arguments ('parts_search.py "ESP32-S3-WROOM-1" --limit 5 --full'), documented JSON output fields, bom_validate.py invocation with exit-code semantics, and specific file paths (product/component-selection.json, product/bom.json). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven clearly sequenced steps with an explicit validation gate ('Run bom_validate.py. Set bom_ready: true only when it passes'), an error feedback loop ('Non-zero prints diagnostics; fix every one'), and explicit unresolved-items handling — satisfying the batch/procurement validation requirement. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body is an overview that delegates the row contract to the verified references/hardware-bom-schema.md and points to vendored originals for deeper rules — one level deep and clearly signaled. Held at 4 because the schema reference is woven into prose rather than presented as a tidy reference block, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |