Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable PRD workflow with concrete JSON artifacts and clear sequencing. The main gap is the single external reference path not bundled with the skill, plus the absence of an explicit error-recovery validation loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no concept explanations Claude already knows; every step and the two minimal JSON examples earn their place, and bulk detail is deferred to a referenced file. Matches the lean/efficient top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready requirements.json and contract.json examples, a concrete user/default/research source taxonomy, and a specific AskQuestion procedure (one batch, 2-4 options, write back source:"user", empty the list) cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six numbered steps are clearly sequenced with an explicit completion gate ("PRD is ready when open_questions is empty") and a resolve-write-back loop. Not a 5 because there is no validate→fix→retry error-recovery feedback loop; not a 3 because the sequence and key checkpoint are present. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with a well-signaled one-level-deep reference at the end. Not a 5 because that reference points to an external `<repo>/reference/replicator-original/...` path that is not present in the staged skill bundle (no ./references/ dir exists), a minor navigation gap; not a 3 because the reference is clearly signaled and content is appropriately split, not buried. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |