Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean overview skill that delegates detail to a real, one-level-deep reference bundle and provides a sequenced workflow with a validation checklist. Main weaknesses are the absence of an inline executable conversion example and a missing explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop.
Suggestions
Add a short inline worked code example (a single frame → one FSD layer) in the body so the core conversion is executable without opening example-mapping.md.
Make the validation step an explicit feedback loop: 'if a checklist item fails, fix and re-run before reporting complete' rather than only 'run the checklist before reporting complete'.
Trim the framing sentences in the intro and Assumptions section (e.g. the framework-agnostic caveat) to push conciseness toward fully lean.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, rule-oriented body with no padding about concepts Claude already knows (no 'what is Figma/Tailwind' exposition); every section is actionable. A few orientation sentences ('This skill is framework-agnostic ...') could be trimmed, keeping it at 4 rather than 5. Not a 3 because it is genuinely efficient rather than merely 'mostly' so. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout — named tools (ESLint, Steiger, dependency-cruiser, axe, Lighthouse), concrete patterns (`@theme { ... }`, `bg-[oklch(...)]`), and an explicit required-state list. No copy-paste code blocks for the core conversion (the worked example is delegated to example-mapping.md), which leaves minor gaps. Not a 5 because the main conversion lacks an inline executable example; not a 3 because guidance is specific and executable, not pseudocode. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 10-step numbered workflow culminating in a validation checklist with verifiable items (grep imports, run linter, run type-check/lint/tests). Not a 5 because there is no explicit 'if validation fails → fix → re-validate' feedback loop, only 'run the checklist before reporting complete'. Not a 3 because checkpoints are explicit and present; the destructive/batch cap does not apply to this generation task. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview body with each major section signaling 'Detailed rules in references/<file>.md', plus a consolidated References list; all 8 referenced files exist in ./references/ and references are one level deep. Matches the anchor 5 pattern of well-signaled one-level-deep references with easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |