Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, highly actionable, and well-structured with concrete commands and a clear sequence. Its only gap is the absence of an explicit retry/feedback loop after the verification step.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop after the verify step, e.g. 'If agents sync --check still reports issues, return to step 2 and re-diagnose.'
Optionally clarify how to interpret each command's output so Claude knows which result points to which troubleshooting priority.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient with no padding or over-explanation; every line delivers a concrete command or actionable priority, respecting the token budget. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Each step is a fully executable, copy-paste-ready command ('agents status --fast', 'agents mcp test --runtime', 'agents doctor', 'agents sync --check') covering the common diagnostic cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with an explicit verification step ('verify with agents sync --check'), but it lacks an explicit retry/feedback loop describing what to do if verification fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, and well-organized into a numbered workflow plus a priorities list, with no need for external references, which qualifies for a top score per the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |