Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and mostly actionable with real API calls and a well-organized structure, but it lacks an executable handler code example and a verification step for the error-handling pipeline.
Suggestions
Add a concrete TryHandleAsync code skeleton showing the conditional exception-to-ProblemDetails mapping instead of describing it in prose.
Add a verification checkpoint, e.g. a sample request that triggers an error and the expected RFC 7807 payload, to confirm the middleware works.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient and domain-specific — lists the required ProblemDetails fields and exact DI/middleware calls without padding with generic .NET explanations; a few lines could still be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable registration calls ("builder.Services.AddExceptionHandler<GlobalExceptionHandler>();", "app.UseExceptionHandler();") and names real APIs, but the handler's TryHandleAsync body is described rather than shown as copy-paste code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The implementation and registration steps are sequenced, but there is no validation or verification checkpoint to confirm the error responses behave as intended. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external bundle files and no need for references; content is cleanly organized into labeled sections (Diretrizes, Implementação do Middleware), satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |