Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a compact, highly structured delegation guide with concrete output contracts, chaining patterns, and guardrails rather than filler. It is actionable and well-sequenced, with only minor room to tighten rationale and formalize validation feedback loops.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, table-and-template driven body that assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining basic concepts; the 'Why this exists' rationale adds one mildly explanatory paragraph, keeping it at 4 rather than a fully trimmed 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete output-contract templates and named chaining recipes (locate→fix→verify, parallel scout, single-shot) are copy-paste-ready and cover common cases; minor gaps (e.g. exact mechanics of parallel spawning) hold it at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The locate→fix→verify pattern is a clearly sequenced multi-step flow with an explicit verify checkpoint (reviewer audits the diff); not quite a full validate→fix→retry feedback loop with error-recovery detail, so 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (comparison table, output contracts, chaining, anti-patterns) with no unnecessary external references for a self-contained guide; minor inlining of dense contract blocks keeps it at 4 over 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |