Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplarily tight instruction skill: concrete per-level examples, explicit escalation/boundary rules, and zero filler or explanations of known concepts. Its only real weaknesses are a duplicated rule between the Rules prose and the ultra row, and a wall-of-prose Rules section that hurts scannability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — rules are stated as terse imperatives with concrete examples and no concept explanations — but the invented-abbreviation and no-arrows rules appear twice (in Rules and again in the 'ultra' table row), and a few justifications could be trimmed, so it sits between efficient and every-token-earns-its-place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete guidance: exact switch commands ('/caveman lite|full|ultra|...'), worked per-level examples for two scenarios (React re-render, connection pooling), a Not/Yes contrast pair, an exact pattern, and a full destructive-op warning example with SQL — an instruction-only skill whose guidance is copy-paste actionable. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A simple single-purpose style skill where the single action is unambiguous: default level, switching, persistence, when to drop the style (Auto-Clarity) and resume, boundaries for persisted artifacts, and revert commands are all explicitly sequenced; no destructive or batch operations are involved, so no validation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Persistence, Rules, Intensity, Auto-Clarity, Boundaries) with a clear intensity table and no external references needed for a single-file skill, but the Rules section is one dense multi-topic paragraph that would benefit from being broken into subsections, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |