Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is an exemplar of terse, high-signal skill writing: a concrete format, exact examples, and clear scope boundaries with no padding. It scores near the top on conciseness, actionability, and disclosure, with only a slight workflow-clarity gap from lacking explicit validation checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean throughout — terse rules, minimal prose, no re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and every line earns its place (e.g. 'No throat-clearing.'), matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete copy-paste format ('L<line>: <problem>. <fix>.'), exact severity prefixes, and three full before/after examples with concrete fixes like 'Add guard before .email' and 'Wrap in withBackoff(3)', fully executable guidance covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single task is unambiguous and the Auto-Clarity and Boundaries sections sequence when to drop terse mode, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints for the review output itself; this is a minor gap rather than the explicit feedback-loop structure of the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a short single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no external bundle files (references/scripts/assets are absent), and it is organized into clearly labeled sections (Rules, Examples, Auto-Clarity, Boundaries), so the simple-skill exception gives it a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |