peer-review
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
76
67%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
93%
1.10xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./scientific-skills/peer-review/SKILL.mdSecurity
1 medium severity finding. This skill can be installed but you should review these findings before use.
W012: Unverifiable external dependency detected (runtime URL that controls agent)
What this means
The skill fetches instructions or code from an external URL at runtime, and the fetched content directly controls the agent’s prompts or executes code. This dynamic dependency allows the external source to modify the agent’s behavior without any changes to the skill itself.
Why it was flagged
Potentially malicious external URL detected (high risk: 0.90). The skill's runtime scripts make authenticated API calls to the OpenRouter endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1 and guidance link https://openrouter.ai/keys) to generate images and receive text critiques that are directly injected into and used to modify subsequent prompts (iterative prompt refinement), and the tool requires an OPENROUTER_API_KEY to run, so this external URL is a required runtime dependency that controls agent prompts.
- Repository
- K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills
- Commit
25e1c0f
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.