CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

scientific-brainstorming

Creative research ideation and exploration. Use for open-ended brainstorming sessions, exploring interdisciplinary connections, challenging assumptions, or identifying research gaps. Best for early-stage research planning when you do not have specific observations yet. For formulating testable hypotheses from data use hypothesis-generation.

73

1.02x
Quality

62%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

89%

1.02x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./scientific-skills/scientific-brainstorming/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Evaluation results

88%

1%

Novel Research Directions for Coral Reef-Microplastics Study

Five-phase brainstorming workflow with divergent techniques

Criteria
Without context
With context

Context-gathering questions

90%

30%

Cross-domain analogies

50%

100%

Assumption reversal

90%

100%

Scale shifting

100%

100%

Technology speculation

100%

100%

Interdisciplinary fusion

100%

100%

Wild ideas encouragement

60%

60%

Connection-making synthesis

100%

100%

Concrete next steps

100%

100%

Encouraging close

60%

80%

92%

11%

Systematic Exploration of Drug Resistance Prediction Approaches

Structured brainstorming methods from references

Criteria
Without context
With context

Structured framework present

70%

100%

Substitute or analogous alternatives

90%

100%

Combination or fusion directions

90%

100%

Cross-domain adaptation

90%

100%

Eliminate or simplify direction

37%

87%

Scale or scope modification

87%

100%

Technology speculation direction

100%

100%

Ranked shortlist with rationale

100%

100%

Synergies between directions

55%

77%

Implicit method use

100%

0%

89%

-6%

Breaking Through a Research Impasse in Neuroimmunology

Adaptive techniques for blocked researcher and conversational style

Criteria
Without context
With context

Problem reframing

100%

91%

Analogy or story for perspective shift

100%

100%

Bold-ideas challenge

91%

75%

Devil's advocate

100%

80%

Failed approaches as opportunities

90%

100%

Provocative what-if scenarios

100%

100%

Constraint removal

62%

37%

Collaborative question style

100%

100%

Intriguing ideas shortlist

100%

100%

Reflection on session productivity

100%

100%

Repository
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills
Evaluated
Agent
Claude Code
Model
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.