CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

market-research-reports

Generate comprehensive market research reports (50+ pages) in the style of top consulting firms (McKinsey, BCG, Gartner). Features professional LaTeX formatting, extensive visual generation with scientific-schematics and generate-image, deep integration with research-lookup for data gathering, and multi-framework strategic analysis including Porter Five Forces, PESTLE, SWOT, TAM/SAM/SOM, and BCG Matrix.

64

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/market-research-reports/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable and well-organized with strong progressive disclosure, but it is verbose (repeated visual lists and overlapping checklists) and the compile workflow lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop. Tightening redundancy and adding a compile-fail retry step would lift the weaker dimensions.

Suggestions

Consolidate the duplicate visual lists and merge the Step 10 quality checklist with the '50+ Page Validation' checklist to remove redundancy and reduce tokens.

Add an explicit feedback loop to Phase 5: 'If xelatex reports errors, read the .log, fix the LaTeX, and re-run the xelatex/bibtex sequence until it compiles cleanly.'

Trim the opening overview paragraph that defines market research reports—Claude already knows this—keeping only the consulting-firm deliverable framing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient and actionable but is padded by repetition—visual lists recur in three places, and the Step 10 quality checklist and the '50+ Page Validation' checklist overlap heavily—plus an opening paragraph explaining what market research reports are.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready executable commands (generate_schematic.py, generate_image.py, research_lookup.py, generate_market_visuals.py, xelatex/bibtex) and complete LaTeX box/table/figure examples.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The five-phase, eleven-step sequence is clear with a quality-review checklist, but the LaTeX compile step lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop (error recovery is only deferred to Troubleshooting), which caps workflow_clarity at 2 for document manipulation.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Overview is well-structured with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references to the real bundle files in references/, assets/, and scripts/ via a dedicated Resources section.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

82%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, distinct, and rich in natural trigger terms, but it omits an explicit 'when to use' clause. Adding a 'Use when...' sentence naming the triggering scenarios would raise completeness to a 3.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause, e.g. 'Use when the user asks for in-depth market research, industry, or competitive analysis reports, market sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM), or consulting-firm-style deliverables.'

Consider including common user phrasings like 'industry report', 'market analysis', 'competitive landscape', or 'due diligence report' to broaden natural trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions—generating 50+ page reports, LaTeX formatting, visual generation via scientific-schematics/generate-image, research-lookup integration, and named frameworks (Porter Five Forces, PESTLE, SWOT, TAM/SAM/SOM, BCG Matrix).

3 / 3

Completeness

Answers 'what' thoroughly but lacks any 'Use when...' or equivalent explicit trigger clause, which caps completeness at 2 per the judging guidelines.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural terms a user would say ('market research reports', 'consulting firms', 'McKinsey, BCG, Gartner', 'LaTeX formatting', plus framework names) rather than abstract jargon.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The consulting-firm-style 50+ page LaTeX market report niche with specific strategic frameworks is clearly distinguishable and unlikely to trigger for the wrong skill.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (905 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.