Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, highly actionable skill body: concrete commands with flags for every tool, explicit validation and partial-failure handling, and a clean overview-to-references split. The only slack is minor trimmable detail in the privacy mechanics and citation sections.
Suggestions
Trim the explicit-file privacy mechanics (mode 0600, symlink/hard-link rejection details) to one line and point to the script's own --help or references for the full contract.
Shorten the citation section to the canonical reference plus the 'fetch before writing' instruction, moving the DOI/version nuances into a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — no explanations of concepts Claude already knows — using terse field enumerations ('cpu.host.logical', 'cpu.cgroup_v2.quota_cores') and direct commands. A few sections could be trimmed, such as the detailed file-permission mechanics ('uses mode 0600 on POSIX, rejects symlinks and path traversal') and the multi-paragraph citation instructions. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every workflow ships a copy-paste-ready command with concrete flags ('python scripts/detect_resources.py --output resource-snapshot.json', the full planner invocation with '--tasks 100 --memory-per-worker-mib 2048', and 'snapshot_tools.py validate/diff'), covering the common cases. Pseudocode is absent and outputs/statuses are named precisely. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is explicit — safety contract, quick start, required interpretation, plan a workload, validate/diff — with real validation checkpoints ('python scripts/snapshot_tools.py validate resource-snapshot.json', planner statuses 'insufficient_memory... do not launch that plan' and 'review_required') and an error-recovery section ('One failed probe must not erase successful observations'). Not 4: feedback loops for inspecting warnings, provenance, and null fields are explicitly spelled out. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-signaled overview ('See references/resource_semantics.md for the detailed platform rules') pointing to real one-level-deep reference files (resource_semantics.md, snapshot_schema.md, sources.md all exist), and the 'Bundled files' section lists each script with its role. The single sibling cross-link in resource_semantics.md points to sources.md, which is also directly linked from SKILL.md, so no content is buried. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |