CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

iso-13485-certification

Prepare and structurally review ISO 13485 QMS scope, controlled documentation, and local evidence manifests. Use for ISO 13485 certification-readiness documentation or for separating related FDA QMSR, MDSAP, and EU MDR/IVDR evidence boundaries; not for legal applicability, compliance, or certification decisions.

73

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

84%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

Highly actionable, well-structured content with executable commands and explicit validation checkpoints across an eight-step workflow. Progressive disclosure is clean — all references are one level deep and resolve to real bundle files; the only minor weakness is some verbosity in boundary and prose sections.

Suggestions

Tighten the 'Non-negotiable boundary' and per-step prose to remove repetition that assumes less competence than needed, improving token efficiency.

Consider moving the long enumerations (e.g. Step 4 review list) into a reference file referenced from SKILL.md to keep the body leaner while preserving detail.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient and free of obvious concept padding, but the boundary/copyright sections and the per-step prose add length that assumes less competence than needed; some enumerations could be tightened without losing clarity.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides complete, executable CLI invocations with real flags and relative paths (e.g. 'python3 scripts/validate_scope_intake.py assets/templates/scope-intake-template.json'), and concrete field lists for each check — copy-paste ready.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

An eight-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (fail-closed templates, exit-code semantics, blocked-closure rules) and clear feedback guidance for error recovery in batch/evidence operations.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is a well-organized overview with one-level-deep references to verified files (references/*.md, assets/templates/*, scripts/*.py), each clearly signaled and listed in dedicated Templates/References sections; all referenced paths resolve to real bundle files.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description with concrete actions, natural trigger terms, and explicit what/when guidance plus a clear out-of-scope clause. It is distinguishable from neighboring skills and uses correct third-person voice.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Prepare and structurally review ISO 13485 QMS scope, controlled documentation, and local evidence manifests' — naming specific artifact types rather than vague verbs.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers what ('Prepare and structurally review...scope, controlled documentation, and local evidence manifests') and when ('Use for ISO 13485 certification-readiness documentation or for separating related FDA QMSR, MDSAP, and EU MDR/IVDR evidence boundaries'), with a clear negative-scope trigger.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural terms a user would say — 'ISO 13485', 'certification-readiness documentation', 'FDA QMSR', 'MDSAP', 'EU MDR/IVDR' — with good coverage of common phrasings.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Narrow niche — ISO 13485 certification-readiness documentation with explicit 'not for legal applicability, compliance, or certification decisions' boundaries — unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 16 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.