Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with a rigorous multi-step workflow, executable examples, and proper progressive disclosure via real referenced bundle files. Minor conciseness tightening possible on repeated cautions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean and assumes Claude's competence (no explaining what a STEP file is or how CAD works); the lengthy worked example and repeated cautions about guessed dimensions push it slightly above the lean anchor but not to a perfect 5, as a few admonitions are restated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable: copy-paste setup commands, a complete `*_model.py` example with build()/interfaces()/checks(), exact script invocations with flags, and a standards-ID list; concrete guidance covers the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight explicitly numbered steps with a mandatory ordering ('Steps 5 and 6 are not optional'), validation checkpoints (check.py facts/interfaces/geometry), and a clear repair feedback loop ('rerun gen.py, and rerun both step 5 and step 6') plus a pre-fabrication reporting checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with one-level-deep references, all of which exist (references/*.md, assets/standards.json, scripts/*); a routing table picks exactly one family reference, and the References/Scripts tables map every file to its contents for easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |