Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, executable overview with strong validation-gated workflows and well-signaled one-level-deep references that all resolve to real files. Only mild inline date/version detail keeps conciseness from the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence — no padding about what protocols.io, REST, or OAuth are — but carries inline time-sensitive detail (the 2026-07-23 refresh date, mixed v3/v4 notes) that, while justified, keeps it just below the lean-every-token-earns-its-place anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready commands with concrete flags and arguments (e.g. `python3 -B scripts/protocols_read.py --execute list --query ... --page-size 10 --max-pages 2`) cover the common read/validate/plan cases fully. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Operating Contract is a numbered sequence and the mutation workflow lists five explicit pre-confirmation checkpoints (snapshot, comparison, token-scope check, irreversible-effect review, fresh confirmation), providing the validation/feedback-loop structure the rubric rewards. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear References section signals one-level-deep links to six reference files (all verified present), with scripts and the schema asset referenced inline; detail is appropriately split out of the overview. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |