Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured router reference: executable verified commands, complete routing and decision tables, and a clear agent workflow with error paths mapped. Remaining gaps are small — trimmable diagram/output redundancy, an undocumented --confidence flag, and inconsistent script path conventions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient with no re-teaching of known concepts — tables, commands, and a tight workflow section. Not 5 because the 16-line ASCII decision diagram restates the binary decision already expressed in the Decision Types table, and the sample Output block partially duplicates the routing table. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Quick Start and Agent Workflow commands are copy-paste ready and the documented flags match the actual script's argparse interface. Not 5 because of minor gaps: the script's --confidence flag is undocumented in the CLI Reference, and the same script is referenced with inconsistent paths ('scripts/db_route.py' vs 'db-router/scripts/db_route.py'). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a single-action router skill and the action is unambiguous: every decision type maps to a concrete next action, including error paths ('unknown_format' → 'Manual investigation', 'skill_needed' → 'Need to build extractor', plus a fallback extractor). Routing is non-destructive, so the missing-validation cap for destructive/batch operations does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The bundle (one script, scripts/db_route.py) is referenced with a valid relative path, sections are well organized, and nothing clearly belongs in a separate file. Not 5 because the dual path convention for the same script across Quick Start and Agent Workflow is a minor navigation/organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |