Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-organized instruction-only skill with concrete reporting structure and built-in safety validation. Its main gap is the absence of executable command examples and an explicit error-recovery loop when a check fails.
Suggestions
Add a brief feedback loop for failed checks (e.g. "If a check fails, record the failure, attempt a targeted fix, and re-run only that check before reporting"), which would lift workflow clarity to 5.
Optionally include one or two concrete example invocations or a minimal example of the three-status report output to make the guidance copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive with no concept explanations or padding; every sentence carries actionable guidance and assumes Claude's competence, fitting the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The three-status reporting structure, the named cases to exercise (normal journey, empty/error, regressions), and the fallback rules are concrete and actionable, but no specific executable commands are given (inherent to a cross-project meta-skill), leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The implied Setup -> Build -> Behavior sequence with checkpoints (review commands before execution, label Not checked, do not claim completion without evidence) is clear, but there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop for failed checks, so it falls short of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a short single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no external references and no bundle files, and its logically grouped paragraphs plus the bulleted status list are well-organized, qualifying for 5 under the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |