Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow, explicit validation and feedback loops, and concrete commands and examples. Its main weakness is a few verbose or large inline sections that could be tightened or moved to reference files.
Suggestions
Move the full worked PR description example and the ASD-STE100 rules list into separate reference files and link to them from the body, to keep the main SKILL.md lean and improve progressive disclosure.
Trim motivational prose such as 'The goal is a description that a new team member reads one time and understands' to keep the content token-efficient.
Consider condensing Step 6's exhaustive list of meaningful-vs-small change examples into a short rule plus one example on each side.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence, but contains a few blocks that could be trimmed (the prose goal statements, the full STE rules list, and the long worked example), giving minor over-explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: exact commands, MCP tool names, a semantic-commit type table, a pre-open checklist, and a complete copy-paste-ready example description covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced Step 1-8 workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (checks.sh before push, pre-open checklist, reproduce->fix->re-run->push CI feedback loop) and checklists for the complex process. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly signaled Rules and Steps with a self-contained structure and no nested references, but several large inline blocks (the STE rules and the full worked example) could be split into separate reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |