Content
33%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is terse and unpadded but contains no actionable instruction, code, or workflow — it merely asserts a naming fact, so it fails on actionability and workflow clarity despite being well-structured.
Suggestions
Add the concrete steps or code the skill is meant to execute, or explicit guidance Claude can follow.
If the skill genuinely performs a task, document a clear sequenced workflow with any needed validation checkpoints.
If the skill is intentionally a stub, state its purpose and intended use so the body conveys actionable direction.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The two-line body is lean with no padding or over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; it is efficient, though the brevity carries little actionable weight. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The body only states that "This skill's name doesn't match its parent directory"; it offers no concrete code, commands, or executable guidance whatsoever. | 1 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no sequence of steps, no action to perform, and no validation; the simple-skill exception does not apply because no unambiguous single action is described. | 1 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references and is organized under a clear heading; structure is good though the content is trivially thin. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 10 / 20 Passed |