Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, token-efficient tool overview with concrete examples and a transparent debugging mechanism. Actionability and workflow clarity are strong but leave room for explicit edge-case and validation guidance.
Suggestions
Add a short error-recovery note for when extraction yields poor or empty results (e.g., how to adjust max_pages/max_time_ms or re-run with seed urls).
Include one concrete example showing the steps array output alongside a weak-result debugging scenario to make the verification loop more actionable.
Clarify when to prefer providing seed urls versus relying on generated search queries, to reduce overlap ambiguity with the extract and research skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the parameters table and JSON quick-reference earn their tokens and every section is purposeful. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready JSON invocation examples and a complete parameters table with types, defaults, and limits, but lacks concrete guidance for handling edge cases or extraction failures. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step How It Works sequence is clear and the steps array serves as an explicit debugging/verification feedback loop ('Use steps to debug weak results'), though validation checkpoints could be more explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with one-level-deep See Also links to sibling skills and no nested references; at ~78 lines it slightly exceeds the simple-skill threshold, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |