Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured routing skill: lean sections, a concrete tool-selection table, a sequenced workflow, and a completion-gates checklist. Its only weakness is mild actionability gaps where directives are stated without execution detail.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean throughout with no concept over-explanation; every section (Purpose, Tool routing, Workflow, Completion gates, Boundaries, Delivery) is terse and assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | A concrete tool-routing table names specific tools and directives like 'one data-kun-component-root' and 'declare minimum remote origins'; minor gaps remain (e.g., 'Test responsive behavior' lacks how-to), and no executable code is given, but it is actionable for an instruction-only routing skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence is present with a separate Completion gates section acting as a checklist; checkpoints are mostly present though slightly implicit, and the operation is non-destructive so the destructive cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, organized into clearly labeled sections; per the simple-skills guideline this warrants a 5 with well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |