minimalist-ui

Clean editorial-style interfaces. Warm monochrome palette, typographic contrast, flat bento grids, muted pastels. No gradients, no heavy shadows.

Quality

48%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/minimalist-skill/SKILL.md

Quality

Discovery

32%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This description reads more like a mood board or style guide summary than a skill description. It effectively communicates a visual aesthetic but fails to describe what actions the skill performs or when Claude should select it. The lack of a 'Use when...' clause and absence of concrete actions significantly limit its utility for skill selection.

Suggestions

Add explicit actions the skill performs, e.g., 'Generates clean editorial-style UI layouts and components' or 'Applies editorial design system to web interfaces'.

Add a 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms, e.g., 'Use when the user asks for minimalist UI design, editorial layouts, bento grid layouts, or clean web interfaces with muted colors.'

Reframe the style descriptors as capabilities rather than adjectives, e.g., 'Creates flat bento grid layouts with warm monochrome palettes and typographic hierarchy' instead of listing style traits passively.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (editorial-style interfaces) and describes visual characteristics (warm monochrome palette, typographic contrast, flat bento grids, muted pastels), but doesn't list concrete actions like 'create layouts', 'style components', or 'generate CSS'.	2 / 3
Completeness	Describes visual style characteristics (what it looks like) but never explicitly states what actions it performs or when Claude should use it. There is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, and the 'what it does' is more of a style description than a capability description.	1 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes some relevant design terms like 'bento grids', 'monochrome', 'pastels', and 'editorial', but misses common user trigger terms like 'UI design', 'web design', 'minimalist', 'clean layout', or 'styling'. Users are unlikely to say 'typographic contrast' or 'flat bento grids' naturally.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The specific aesthetic described (editorial, warm monochrome, bento grids, no gradients) is fairly distinctive from other design skills, but without clear action verbs or use-case triggers, it could overlap with other UI/design styling skills.	2 / 3
	Total	7 / 12 Passed

Implementation

64%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a strong, highly specific design system skill with excellent actionability — nearly every directive includes concrete values, exact CSS properties, and named resources. Its main weaknesses are moderate verbosity (editorial flavor text that doesn't add instruction value), a monolithic structure that could benefit from splitting into referenced sub-files, and a workflow section that lacks validation checkpoints to verify compliance with the extensive banned-elements list.

Suggestions

Add a validation checklist step in the Execution Protocol (Section 8) that explicitly verifies output against the banned elements in Section 2 — e.g., 'Review: confirm no Inter/Roboto fonts, no shadow-md+, no emojis, no gradients.'

Split detailed specifications (color palette, component specs, animation specs) into separate referenced files to improve progressive disclosure and reduce the main skill's token footprint.

Trim editorial flavor text like 'Motion should feel invisible — present but never distracting. The goal is quiet sophistication, not spectacle' — the concrete specs already communicate this.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The skill contains some unnecessary verbosity (e.g., 'Protocol Overview' description restates what the constraints already show, phrases like 'analogous to top-tier workspace platforms' and 'quiet sophistication, not spectacle' are flavor text). However, most content is specific design tokens and concrete values, which earn their place. Could be tightened by ~30%.	2 / 3
Actionability	Highly actionable with specific hex codes, exact CSS properties, named font stacks, precise border-radius values, exact animation curves and durations, named icon libraries, and concrete Tailwind classes. Nearly every directive is copy-paste ready with exact values rather than vague guidance.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Section 8 'Execution Protocol' provides a clear 7-step sequence for building layouts, but lacks any validation checkpoints or feedback loops (e.g., no step to verify color contrast accessibility, no visual QA checklist, no 'check against banned elements' verification step). For a skill that involves many strict constraints, a validation step would be important.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The content is well-organized into logical sections with clear headings, but it's a monolithic document (~150+ lines of dense specification). Color palettes, component specs, and animation details could be split into referenced files. No external references or layered navigation is provided.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: Leonxlnx/taste-skill
Commit: 840b46b

Reviewed: 5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.