Content
62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill is well-structured and actionable with a clear subagent-based workflow and concrete output template. Its main weaknesses are redundant duplication of the dispatch list and criteria, and the absence of a validation step before aggregating subagent findings.
Suggestions
Consolidate the duplicated subagent dispatch lists and criteria (Execution Strategy/Review Process and Review Criteria/Subagent Review Criteria) into a single authoritative section to cut tokens.
Add a validation checkpoint after subagents return, e.g. verify each finding has location/severity/category before aggregating, and re-dispatch any pass that returned no findings rather than silently proceeding.
Fill the <FOCUS AREA> and <criteria> placeholders in the prompt template with one worked example per pass so the template is copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and well-sectioned, but it repeats the subagent dispatch list and review criteria twice (Execution Strategy vs. Review Process, and Review Criteria vs. Subagent Review Criteria), which is padding that could be consolidated. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a concrete subagent prompt template, structured finding fields, and an explicit report format with location/severity/category tags; the only gap is that the subagent template uses placeholders like <FOCUS AREA> rather than fully filled examples per pass. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-step process (identify scope, gather context, dispatch in parallel, aggregate, write report) is clearly sequenced, but this is a batch aggregation operation with no validation checkpoint confirming subagent output completeness or schema before aggregation. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a sub-50-line-equivalent single-purpose review skill with no bundle files, the content is well-organized into clearly signaled sections (criteria, principles, output format, process); no external references are needed and navigation is straightforward. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |