Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with a clear sequence and output template, scoring well on workflow clarity and organization. Its main weaknesses are conceptual redundancy between the two step frameworks and the lack of a worked example, which hold conciseness and actionability at the 2-band.
Suggestions
Merge the 'Your Task' and 'Review Process' step lists into a single sequenced workflow to remove the duplicated framing and tighten the body.
Add one short worked example of a completed issue entry (Problem/Example/Recommendation with real TypeScript) so the output template is actionable rather than a bare skeleton.
Trim the questions-as-bullets in the criteria into imperative checks to reduce token weight while preserving coverage.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining what DX is, but 'Your Task' (steps 1-4) and 'Review Process' (steps 1-4) overlap conceptually and could be consolidated. Matches anchor 2 ('Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'); below 3 because of the duplicated framing. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete output template, output path (.agents/scratch/dx-review-<scope>.md), and named criteria categories, but only as an empty skeleton with no worked example of a filled-in review. Matches anchor 2 ('Some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details'). | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The process is clearly sequenced with checklist-like criteria and an explicit output structure, and the task is a non-destructive analysis so validation checkpoints are not required (the cap-at-2 rule applies only to destructive/batch operations). Matches anchor 3 for this context. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a self-contained prompt with no need for external bundle references, and is organized into clearly headed, navigable sections (Task, Criteria, Process, Output Format, Guidelines). Per the rubric's simple-skill allowance, well-organized sections without external references can score 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |