Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean and well-organized with a sensible section structure, and the trigger scenarios in the body partially compensate for the description's missing 'when'. However, it reads as a feature brochure rather than an operating manual: it never tells the agent how to actually perform a review or what the severity levels mean.
Suggestions
Add a concrete review procedure (e.g. scan diff hunk by hunk → check against the listed issue categories → assign severity → verify each finding against the code before reporting it) so the agent knows how to execute rather than just what to output.
Define the severity levels used in the output format (e.g. 严重/警告/建议 with one-line criteria each) and include a short example report so the output spec is actionable.
Merge or trim the redundant intro line and 使用方式 section, which restate the description without adding operational value.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short with no concept re-education, but the opening line restates the description and the 使用方式 section ("Skill 会自动分析并输出审查报告") adds little value, matching the anchor of efficient content with minor instances that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Issue categories ("空指针风险、未处理异常、资源泄漏") and an output structure ("严重程度 + 位置 + 描述") are named, but there is no review procedure, no severity scale definition, and no example report — high-level hints missing the specific steps to execute, which matches anchor 2 rather than 3. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single action is stated ("直接将代码片段或 diff 发给 Agent"), but the analysis process — how to scan the code, how to classify severity, how to decide what counts as a problem — is entirely implicit, fitting the anchor of a sequence present with checkpoints missing or implicit. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references, and none are bundled; the four well-organized section headers (功能, 触发场景, 使用方式, 输出格式) satisfy the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |