Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with clear sequencing, validation checkpoints, a worked example, and excellent progressive disclosure via clearly-labeled reference files. Its main weakness is mild verbosity from repeated purpose/boilerplate sections and descriptive-rather-than-executable analysis steps.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'When This Must Trigger', 'What This Skill Does', and intro paragraphs to remove repeated purpose statements and tighten the token budget.
Replace or augment the descriptive analysis steps with one concrete executable snippet (e.g., a sample CSV-parsing command or script) to push actionability to 5.
Convert the Output Validation checklist into an explicit validate-then-fix-retry loop for the toxic-link/disavow path to reach workflow_clarity 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with clear sections and a concrete example, but it reiterates skill purpose across 'When This Must Trigger', 'What This Skill Does', and the intro, and explains some near-obvious framing (e.g. the repeated Skill Contract / State Model boilerplate) that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready prompt templates, a fully worked markdown example with tables, and concrete 7-step instructions with specific metric names; minor gaps are that the analysis steps are descriptive prompts rather than executable code or commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 7-step process is clearly sequenced with explicit Input and Output Validation Checkpoints (checklists) and a gate-check feedback loop, matching the 'clear sequence with most checkpoints' anchor; it falls short of 5 because the validation is checklist-based rather than an automated validate-fix-retry loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a concise overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to three real bundle files (analysis-templates.md, link-quality-rubric.md, outreach-templates.md), each clearly labeled with what it contains; navigation is easy and content is appropriately split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |