Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-structured, with concrete commands, explicit validation gates, and a defined retry-then-stop feedback loop, with only minor conciseness trimming possible.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, assumes Claude's competence (no 'what is a PDF' padding), and uses concrete commands, with only minor justificatory sentences that could be trimmed, matching the 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' anchor rather than the fully lean anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready guidance across the common cases — a complete `soffice --headless` command, concrete function calls (`load_source_document`, `verify_artifact`, `save_artifact`), and specific numeric defaults (18mm margins, 10-11pt, 1.3-1.5 line height) — fully executable and covering the main scenarios. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | It sequences the full lifecycle (renderer choice → create/convert → revision → quality gate → save) with explicit validation checkpoints and a defined feedback loop ('fix all blockers together, regenerate once... reverify... if a blocker remains, stop and explain'), matching the explicit-validation-with-error-recovery anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the skill is self-contained and organized into well-signaled sections (renderer choice, converting existing files, revisions, quality gate) with clear headers, satisfying the simple-skill exception for well-organized single-file content. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |