Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable SEO writing skill with a clear validated workflow and properly signaled one-level-deep references, though its length and templated boilerplate could be tightened for token efficiency.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated placeholder markdown templates (requirements, research, title, meta, links) into a single parameterized template to reduce boilerplate.
Move the 50-phrase trigger list out of frontmatter or trim to the highest-signal phrases to reclaim context budget.
Use local relative reference paths (references/seo-writing-checklist.md) instead of absolute GitHub URLs so links resolve in-bundle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is long (~370 lines) with repeated templated placeholder blocks and restated SEO advice, plus a 50-phrase frontmatter trigger list; mostly actionable but padded rather than lean, matching 'mostly efficient but could be tightened'. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready markdown templates and specific numeric thresholds ("150-160 characters", "≥5 precise numbers", "FAQ 40-60 word answers"), meeting the 'fully executable / specific examples' anchor for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 9-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (Input/Output Validation), an Issue Classification with auto-correct vs needs-decision handling, and a self-check feedback loop matches 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops'. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Points to one-level-deep, clearly signaled references (seo-writing-checklist.md, title-formulas.md, content-structure-templates.md) that all exist in ./references/, with a dedicated Reference Materials section matching the 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |