Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-organized instruction skill that gives concrete input-gathering, output-shape, and anti-fabrication guidance without padding. Its main gap is the absence of a worked output example and an explicit citation-verification step, which keep actionability and workflow clarity at 4 rather than 5.
Suggestions
Add one short worked example of the three-section output so the expected format is unambiguous and copy-paste-ready.
Add an explicit verification step requiring that every cited decision/question be checked against a real retrieved message before emitting the summary, closing the workflow-clarity feedback-loop gap.
Briefly note the search mechanism or source of truth (e.g., Slack MCP / history export) so Claude knows where to pull messages from.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it never explains what Slack is, gives only operational guidance ('Confirm before searching', a three-section output shape, a tight 'What not to do' list), and every line earns its place, matching the anchor 5 'lean and efficient' example rather than the slightly-padded anchor 4. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, specific guidance — exact input confirmations (channel(s)/thread(s), time window with a 7-day default), a precise three-section output structure with citation and @mention rules, and explicit edge-case handling — but lacks a concrete worked example of the output and does not specify the search mechanism, so it is mostly-executable with minor gaps per anchor 4 rather than fully copy-paste-ready anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is a clear sequence (confirm inputs -> search -> produce the three sections) with verification checkpoints ('Don't guess if ambiguous', 'If the channel was empty... say so', 'don't fabricate filler', 'don't invent assignees'), but there is no explicit citation-verification feedback loop, fitting anchor 4's 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps' rather than the full feedback-loop anchor 5; the destructive/batch cap does not apply since summarization is read-only. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, has no bundle files, and is organized into well-signaled sections (When to use, Required inputs, Output shape, What not to do), so per the simple-skills exception it scores 5 with just well-organized sections and no need for external references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |