CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

maple-otel-spec-review

Review a diff, PR, or specific file in this repo for OpenTelemetry *specification* compliance, grounded in the source-linked spec corpus at docs/otel-spec/ (snapshot v1.58.0). Triggers on requests like 'is this spec compliant', 'review this PR against the OTel spec', 'spec-review this diff', 'check my partial-success handling', 'are these retryable status codes right', 'does apps/ingest honor the OTLP spec', and on reviews of changes touching the OTLP server surface in apps/ingest (partial success, retryable set {429, 502, 503, 504}, protobuf Status bodies, gzip, OTLP/JSON encoding), self-instrumentation (apps/api tracer setup, apps/ingest/src/otel.rs, lib/effect-sdk), or consumers of span status / SeverityNumber / db.query.text (WarehouseQueryService, query-engine). Spec MUSTs and SHOULDs only — for Maple house conventions use maple-telemetry-conventions; for whole-project instrumentation audits use maple-audit; for general diff correctness use /code-review.

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a dense, high-signal routing skill: a routing table, a cached MUSTs quick-reference, a sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints, and explicit hard rules. No bundle files exist, so progressive disclosure is judged on internal organization and the one-level-deep spec corpus references.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what OpenTelemetry is — and every section (routing table, load-bearing MUSTs cache, steps, hard rules) earns its place rather than padding, fitting the 'lean and efficient' anchor.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete executable commands (`Grep -n '^##' docs/otel-spec/<file>.md`, `git show <sha>`, `bun typecheck`, `cargo check`) plus specific file→heading routing and a copy-paste report template, matching 'fully executable / copy-paste ready'.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear six-step sequence (Scope → Classify → Load → Review → Report → Apply) with explicit checkpoints — 'Present the report before making any edit' and post-edit re-verification ('A fix that breaks the build is a regression — fix or revert it') — matches the validation-checklist anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Content is organized into well-signaled sections (Severity, Routing table, Load-bearing MUSTs, Steps, Hard rules) and references to the docs/otel-spec/ corpus are one level deep (file → heading) with no nested indirection, matching the clear-overview anchor.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, third-person, and rich with natural trigger phrases while explicitly delineating its niche from three sibling skills. It clearly answers both what the skill does and when to use it.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Review a diff, PR, or specific file in this repo for OpenTelemetry *specification* compliance' — rather than vague language, matching the 'multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (OTel spec-compliance review grounded in docs/otel-spec/) and when ('Triggers on requests like…' plus specific code-surface signals), satisfying the explicit-trigger requirement.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrasings a user would actually say — 'is this spec compliant', 'review this PR against the OTel spec', 'spec-review this diff', 'are these retryable status codes right' — giving good coverage of trigger variations.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Carves a clear niche (OTel spec MUSTs/SHOULDs only) and explicitly redirects overlapping work to maple-telemetry-conventions, maple-audit, and /code-review, making wrong-skill triggering unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
MapleTechLabs/maple
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.