Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable recall protocol that names the exact MCP tools, gives a tool-selection table, sequences the workflow with checkpoints, and handles unhappy paths with recovery guidance. The only trim opportunity is the persona flourish and the repeated verbatim emphasis.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts, but the persona 'Identity' paragraph and the verbatim principle restated across Protocol and Anti-patterns are minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete MCP tool names, a need-to-tool selection table, explicit decision rules (supersede vs invalidate vs add), and argument guidance, giving fully executable instruction-level guidance for the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Protocol is a clear numbered sequence with decision checkpoints ('If unsure... query') and an Unhappy-paths section that supplies error-recovery feedback loops, satisfying clear sequence with feedback for error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with a single one-level-deep canonical reference (recall-protocol.md) and a short Official References list; no bundle files exist, so well-structured sections score at the top of the scale. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |